Tax policy is a hot potato and controversial. It can propel a presidential candidate into the headlines, but it can also make the candidate an easy target for opponents and pundits alike. Sen. Paul’s bold proposal is a fine beginning and merits productive discussion. Hopefully it will not be dismissed by knee-jerk opposition.
The way we tax ourselves should be separated from the purposes to which we apply the revenue we need. Ideally, on the personal income tax side this plan would have eliminated – purely – all deductions. Sen. Paul, in sensible practicality..to head off congressional opposition..has incorporated deductions for mortgages and charitable contributions. The mortgage deduction will placate the real estate lobby, but it will also create the precedent for other industries to lobby for their gain. The proverbial camel’s nose under the tent.
Critics are circling over the potential shortfall in total revenues. Once revenue needs are clearly defined, if more revenue is needed the plan can be fixed by increasing the 14.5% rate in the Business Activity Tax, a value-added tax, and by adding one or two tax brackets on the personal income tax side. The addition of another personal tax bracket or two will change the definition from a “flat” tax with a single percentage for both business and personal taxes, but would provide the necessary flexibility to ensure progressive distribution of the tax burden. The tax base will be clean.
Importantly, Paul’s Business Activity Tax will finally harmonize the U.S. tax system with all of our trading partners; over 165 countries now use the border-adjustable VAT to our current competitive disadvantage in world trade. With Paul’s BAT, the cost of government paid by the BAT will be subtracted from U.S. exports and added to imports, neutralizing that government burden in the price/value comparison of goods and services crossing borders.
Bottom Line: Sen. Paul’s plan is an excellent beginning. Let’s not let the pundits and political opponents kill it this time. Let’s fix it.